Contempt application dismissed in default as neither the applicant's counsel appeared nor sought adjournment; any notice issued against the respondents stands discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1122 of 2016
Shachindra Kumar Shukla
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Smt. Neena Sharma Incharge Corp.And Anr. |
M.D.U.P.Handlooms ..... |
Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Ashish Mishra, Sarvendra Gupta, Satya Narain Shukla : |
Kumar |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
November 6, 2025
S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shachindra Kumar Shukla
Smt. Neena Sharma Incharge Corp. M.D.U.P. Handlooms
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
