Mo. Shahid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Allahabad HCBAIL/9633/2025
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
¶2
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9633 of 2025
¶3
Mo. Shahid
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus
¶6
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
¶7
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Vishwanath Pandey |
Tiwari, | Brijesh Kumar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. | ||
| Court No.- 12 |
¶8
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
¶9
- 1 . Learned A.G.A. is directed to file objection within two weeks.
¶10
- 2 . List this case on 06.11.2025 .
¶11
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Mo. Shahid
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Coram
AI extract
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/9633/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hindustan Unilever Limited Thru. Authorized Signatory Vs Presiding Officer,Labour Court,Faizabad and Another
Harishchandra Pathak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Finance Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Priyanshu Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Madhyamik Education Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Arya Ram Rati Devi Pharmacy College Azamgarh Thru. Its Manager Satish Kumar and 8 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy.. Deptt. of Tech. Edu. Lko. and 3 Others