Salman Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56954

Court No. - 47

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9003 of 2025

Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Preetam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶8

By means of this application, the applicant, Salman who is involved in Case Crime No. 568 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 332, 353, 336, 427, 436, 307, 395, 352, 504, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station- Dakshin, District- Firozabad and is in jail since 09.02.2025 is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused, Bhura @ Imran and Zeeshan have already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court by orders dated 8.8.2024 and 25.11.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 25541 of 2024 and 39199 of 2021. He has further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Bhura @ Imran and Zeeshan, who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity and for the reasons given in the order of coaccused.

¶10

The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.

¶11

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.

¶12

In view of the above, let the applicant be released on bail on

¶13

his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions :-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶19

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Mini

¶22

Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Salman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases