Bail application listed for hearing; a supplementary affidavit was taken on record and the State was granted two weeks to file its counter affidavit. The court adjourned the matter to the week commencing 06.10.2025 without deciding anything.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8338 of 2025
Rupesh Singh @ Ranu Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinay Kumar, Ajay Kumar Verma, Muskan Bharti, Shubham Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
The learned counsel for the applicant has filed a supplementary affidavit today in court, which is taken on record.
Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State prays for and is granted two weeks' time for filing a counter affidavit.
List this case in the week commencing 06.10.2025.
September 9, 2025 Ram.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rupesh Singh @ Ranu Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
