Sazid vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72103

Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7983 of 2025

Applicant :- Sazid Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant during argument, is taken on record.

¶7

2.. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking regular bail in Case Crime No. 356 of 2024, under Sections 309(6), 317(2) BNS, 2023, Police Station - Jani, District - Meerut during pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that similarly placed co-accused Sikandar has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 4.4.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3358 of 2025 and, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.1.2025. It is also undertaken on behalf of the applicant that he shall abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by the Court while granting bail.

¶9

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the instant bail application but he could not dispute the aforesaid facts as stated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant during argument.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.K. Singh, Brief Holder on behalf of the State, and perused the material available on record.

¶11

Taking into consideration of aforesaid reasons as stated above and the fact that similarly placed co-accused Sikandar has already

¶12

been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶13

Let the applicant - Sazid, who is involved in the aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶14

(i). The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 BNSS. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate of without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 5.5.2025 S.K.S.

¶17

(Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sazid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sazid v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ashish Kumar vs State of U.P.

Rohan Yadav vs State of U.P.

Vinod Kumar Tripathi vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dilip vs State of U.P.

Farman vs State of U.P.

Vijay Jain vs State of U.P.