Regular bail application under Section 439 BNSS for a Sessions Court case where offences were added during investigation; counsel withdrew the application to seek permission to apply first before the Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7964 of 2025
Pramod Kumar Upadhyay
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
September 3, 2025
Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant could seek bail before the High Court without first applying before the Sessions Court after additional offences were added during trial.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pramod Kumar Upadhyay
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
