Sadab @ Shadab v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned pending counter affidavit from the State.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7897 of 2025
Sadab @ Shadab
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Taufiq Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the respondent State.
Two weeks’ time is granted to learned A.G.A. to file counter affidavit.
Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week thereafter.
List this case on 16.09.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sadab @ Shadab
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/7897/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Manish Kumar
- Order 2 · Manish Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Meera Devi Vs Dr. Ratan Pal Singh Suman Director General Family Welfare Lko.
Kamta Prasad Vs Prathmesh Kumar, Vice Chairman Lko. Development Authority Lko.
Arohi Saxena, Thru. the Power of Attorney Holder Adarsh Saxena Vs Shri Vishak G, Dist. Magistrate Distt. Lko.
Sanjay Kumar Chaudhary vs Shri Atal Kumar Rai Director Panchayati Raj Vibhag U.P. Lohiya Bhawan Lko. and Another