Allowed¶10

Raja Miya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Mar 2025BAIL/7232/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; U.P. Gangster Act Section 3(1); Case Crime No. 06 of 2025; Police Station Pipari; District Sonbhadra; gang chart single case; custody since 08.01.2025; Satendra Kumar Antil v. C.B.I.; personal bond and two sureties; bail conditions; tampering with witnesses; cancellation of bail; Allahabad High Court; Deepak Verma, J.; Raja Miya; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 7232 of 2025.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Raja Miya to be released on bail in Case Crime No. 06 of 2025 (Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act, P.S. Pipari, District Sonbhadra) on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to verification of sureties and the imposed conditions. ¶10

Raja Miya vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Raja Miya should be released on bail in Case Crime No. 06 of 2025, registered under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act at Police Station Pipari, District Sonbhadra, during pendency of the trial.

¶7

Court's answer

Considering the facts, submissions, nature of offence, evidence and complicity of the accused, and without expressing any opinion on merits, and keeping in view the law laid down in Satendra Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., the Court held the applicant had made out a case for bail and allowed the bail application.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to stated conditions, with sureties to be verified before issuance of the release order.

¶11

Key takeaways

Breach of any of the imposed bail conditions (no tampering with prosecution evidence or intimidating/pressurising witnesses; sincere cooperation in trial without adjournments; no criminal activity after release) shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.ratio¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Deepak Verma, J.), by order dated 11.3.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7232 of 2025, admitted applicant Raja Miya to bail in Case Crime No. 06 of 2025, Police Station Pipari, District Sonbhadra, registered under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act, during pendency of trial. Counsel submitted that only one case figured in the gang chart, in which the applicant had already obtained bail, that he had no other criminal history, and that he was in custody since 08.01.2025. Considering the nature of the offence, evidence and complicity of the accused, without expressing any opinion on merits, and keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil v. C.B.I. & Another, S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, the Court found the applicant had made out a case for bail and directed release on a personal bond with two sureties of like amount (sureties to be verified before release), subject to conditions of not tampering with prosecution evidence or pressurising witnesses, sincere cooperation in trial without seeking adjournments, and abstention from criminal activity, breach of any of which would be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35538

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7232 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Raja Miya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 06 of 2025, registered under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act, Police StationPipari, District- Sonbhadra, during pendency of the trial.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that one case is shown in the gang chart on that account provisions of Gangster Act has been imposed. He further submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant has been granted bail in the case shown in the gang chart which is annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit. The applicant has no criminal history except the case shown in the gang chart. The applicant neither involved in any anti social activities nor a leader of any gang. The applicant is languishing in jail since 08.01.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another , S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant- Raja Miya , who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Aditya

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Raja Miya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Miya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bhupendra Singh Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajendra Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramkali Alias Geeta vs State of U.P. and Another

Safik vs State of U.P.

Monu Sharma @ Manish vs State of U.P. and Another

Shailendra Singh @ Kaka vs State of U.P. and Another