Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40538

¶2

Court No. - 14

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6530 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.

¶5

Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra,Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶8

The present bail application has been filed by accused-applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.183 of 2025, under Sections 3/5kha/8 of the Utttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Salone, District Raebareli.

¶9

Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant is not named in the F.I.R. Applicant has not been caught from the spot. There is no recovery from the applicant. Applicant has explained the criminal history of one case in the bail application. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 23.05.2025.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer.

¶11

On due consideration to the submissions advanced, perusal of the record as also the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 23.05.2025, applicant is not named in the F.I.R., nothing has been recovered from the applicant and applicant has not been caught from the spot and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.

¶12

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶13

Let the applicant Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan be released on bail in aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:

¶14

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶15

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Panel Code (now Section 269 of BNS).

¶19

(vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings

¶20

against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Panel Code (now Section 209 BNS).

¶21

Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Saurabh Yadav/-

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Pathak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Awashti Vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home

Gaurav Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sadan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vishal Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Vaheed Khan @ Ramjaan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.