Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Ministry Lko — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Ministry Lko — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Release of Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025 upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to three stated conditions (attendance at hearings; no similar offence; no inducement/threat/promise and no tampering with evidence).

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar is entitled to be enlarged on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025 (Ss. 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 126(2), 352, 351(3) BNS), P.S. Shivratanganj, District Amethi. +1 more

Court's answer

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, considering the general allegations levelled against all the persons, and given that the applicant is in jail since 03.05.2025 and has a criminal history of one case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

Ratio / Principle

The bail application is allowed: the applicant Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar shall be released on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025 upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the stated conditions (attending hearings; committing no similar offence; making no inducement, threat or promise and not tampering with evidence).

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 15 — Karunesh Singh Pawar, Judge — Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5511 of 2025, decided December 12, 2025. Allowed. Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar, held in custody since 03.05.2025 and carrying a criminal history of one case, is enlarged on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025, prosecuted under Ss. 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 126(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS, P.S. Shivratanganj, District Amethi. Grant made considering the general allegations levelled against all accused and expressly without commenting upon the merits of the case; counsel had sought parity with co-accused Shesh Shukla @ Suyash Shukla, Girija Shankar Shukla, Adarsh Shukla and Devesh Shukla, already enlarged by coordinate Bench orders dated 01.12.2025, 21.11.2025 and 24.11.2025. Release ordered on a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, subject to conditions of attendance at hearings, commission of no similar offence, and no inducement, threat, promise or tampering with evidence.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5511 of 2025

Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Ministry Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Sharma, Rahul Yadav, Sunny Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kaushal Tiwari

Court No. - 15

HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.

The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 46 of 2025, under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 126(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S. Shivratanganj, District Amethi.

Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that ten unknown persons and 2 to 3 known persons had attacked the brother of the informant which resulted in substantial injuries. Injury report is on record. He further submits that co-accused persons Shesh Shukla @ Suyash Shukla, Girija Shankar Shukla, Adarsh Shukla and Devesh Shukla have been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 01.12.2025, 21.11.2025, 24.11.2025 and 24.11.2025. The applicant seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused persons.

Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

Considering the general allegations levelled against the all the persons, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 03.05.2025, and has criminal history of one case, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed .

BAIL No. 5511 of 2025

2

Let the applicant Vinay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)

December 12, 2025 R.C.

Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench