Allowed

Junaid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2025BAIL/5067/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Junaid bail, U.P. Gangsters Act S. 3(1), Case Crime 137/2025, P.S. Haidergarh, Barabanki; single case in gang chart with prior bail; 11 other cases explained; custody since 25.1.2025; undertaking under S. 19(4)(b); conditions incl. S. 84 BNSS / S. 209 BNS consequences; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION 5067 of 2025; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; coun

What did the court decide?

Applicant Junaid to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to conditions including non-tampering

Junaid Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43104

¶2

Court No. - 14

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5067 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Junaid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by accusedapplicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 137 of 2025, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Haidergarh, DistrictBarabanki.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, only single case has been shown against the applicant, in which he has been enlarged on bail. The bail order is on record as Annexure-3 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Apart from the single case mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has criminal history of 11 more cases which have been explained in para nos. 7 and 8 of the bail application. The applicant is in jail since since 25.1.2025.

¶9

It is also submitted that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

¶10

It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

On due consideration to the facts that the applicant is in jail since 25.1.2025; the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the case(s) shown in the gang chart; apart from the single case shown in the gang chart, he has criminal history of 11 more cases which have been duly explained in the bail application and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.

¶13

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶14

Let the applicant- Junaid involved in the aforesaid case crime number be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶15

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶16

(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶17

(iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶19

(v) The applicant shall also file an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case or misuse the liberty of bail.

¶20

(vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶21

(vii) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 BNSS is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of BNS.

¶22

Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Shravan

¶23

Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Junaid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Junaid v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Gyan Prakash Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Gyan Prakash Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Jay Prakash Tiwari @ Pandit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 2 Others

Himanshu Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mohd. Zakir Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.