Vipin Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application of the applicant adjourned as neither the applicant nor counsel appeared despite the case being taken in the revised list; case listed for a later date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5056 of 2025
Vipin Kumar Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Saroj, Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 51
HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
None for the applicant despite taking the case in revised list. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
List this case on 09.01.2026.
(Raj Beer Singh,J.)
December 5, 2025
S Rawat
Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vipin Kumar Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/5056/2025
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court