Allowed¶7

Lakshman v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Feb 2025BAIL/4727/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lakshman v. State of U.P.; bail application allowed; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 35); Shekhar Kumar Yadav, Judge; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4727 of 2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:21772; order date 14.2.2025; FIR No. 340 of 2023; Section 2/3, U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (Gangsters Act); conditional bail; personal bond and two effective sureties; conditions: attendance at trial, no improper influence, no tampering/interference; cancellation of bail on breach of conditions; counsel Mohd Nasir; G.A.; OCR-corrupted Hindi source text.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: applicant Lakshman to be released on furnishing a personal bond and two effective sureties, subject to the three conditions stated in the order; bail cancellable by the trial court on breach of any condition.

Lakshman vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶7

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant (Lakshman), accused in connection with FIR No. 340 of 2023 under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, should be released on bail.

¶6

Court's answer

Bail application allowed: the applicant is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two effective sureties of the amount referred to in the order, to the satisfaction of the court.

¶7

Ratio / Principle

Condition (I) of bail: the applicant shall remain present before the concerned court during the trial.

¶7

Key takeaways

Condition (II) of bail: the applicant shall not seek to improperly influence (persons/witnesses connected with the proceedings).ratio¶7
Condition (III) of bail: during the trial the applicant shall not indulge in any tampering/interference (with witnesses/complainant side).ratio¶7
If the applicant violates any of the above conditions, the trial court will be free to cancel his bail.ratio¶8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail application ALLOWED — Lakshman v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4727 of 2025 (High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 35), single-judge order of Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J., dated 14.2.2025 (Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:21772). The applicant, named in FIR No. 340 of 2023 under Section 2/3, U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, was found fit for release on bail without entering into the merits. Terms: release on furnishing a personal bond together with two effective sureties of the amount indicated, to the satisfaction of the court, subject to (I) presence before the concerned court throughout the trial, (II) no exertion of improper influence in connection with the trial, and (III) no tampering/interference during the trial; breach of any condition authorises the trial court to cancel the bail. Counsel: Mohd Nasir (applicant); G.A. (State of U.P.).

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21772

¶2

Court No. - 35

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4727 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Lakshman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Nasir Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

1- आववदककवववददनअधधवकदददरदआजपपरकशपथ-पतददधखलवकयदगयद, धजसव पतदवललपररखदजदए।

¶7

2- यहददणणणकपककररजमदनतपदथरनदपत, आववदकककओरसवमम०अ०सस० 340 वरर 2023 अनतगरतधदरद 2/3 उ०प०वगररहबनदएवससमदजववररधलवकयदकलदप (वनवदरर) अधधवनयम, 1986, थदनदझझझदनद, धजलदशदमललममजमदनतपरममककरनवहवतमपसतमतवकयदगयदहह।

¶8

3- आववदकककओरसवववददनअधधवकदएवसरदजयककओरसवववददनअपरशदसककय अधधवकदकरसमनदएवसपतदवललकदसमयकपररशललनवकयद।

¶9

4- आववदककवववददनअधधवकदददरदयहतकरपसतमतवकयदगयदवकआववदकवनदररहहउसव इसपकररममझपसठदफससदयदगयदहह।आववदककवववरदवगररहबनदतदधलकदमममदतएक ममकदमददशदरयदगयदहहधजसममवहजमदनतपरहह।उकजमदनतआदवश, इसजमदनतआववदन पतकवसदथससलगवकयदगयदहह।इसकवअवतररकआववदककददरममकदममकदआपरदधधक इवतहदसहहधजसममभलवहजमदनतपरहह।आववदकवकसलवगररहकदसदसयनहझहह।आववदक कदसमदजममकरईभयवयदपनहझहह।आववदकवदनदनक 06.02.2024 सवकदरदगदरममवनरदहह। ऐसलदशदममआववदकजमदनतपरममकवकयवजदनवयरगयहह

¶10

5- ववददनअपरशदसककयअधधवकदददरदआववदकककजमदनतकदववररधवकयदगयद।

¶11

6- समसततथयएवसपररणसथवतययकरदवषगतरखतवहहएतथदपसतमतमदमलवकवगमर-दररपर वबनदकरईवटपपरलवकयवमवरवववचदरसवआववदककरजमदनतपरछरडनदउवचतपतलतहरतदहह।

¶12

7- तदनमसदरआवदवकलकमरकदजमदनतपदथरनदपतसवलकदरवकयदजदतदहह।उसवउपररक अपरदधममवनमनशतरसकवसदथसमबणनधतनयदयदलयककसनतमवषपरवयवकगतबसधपतएवस उसलधनरदवशकवदरपवतभपपसतमतकरनवपरजमदनतपरछरडवदयदजदए।

¶13

(I) आववदकववचदररकवददरदनसमबणनधतनयदयदलयकवसमकउपणसथतहरगद।

¶14

(II) आववदकगवदहदनकरवकसलभलपकदरसवपभदववतनहझकरवगद।

¶15

(III) आववदकववचदररकवददरदनसदकयसवकरईछवडछदणनहझकरवगद।

¶16

8- यवदआववदकददरदउपररकशतरसकदउलसघनवकयदजदतदहहतरववचदररनयदयदलयकरयह छपटरहवगलवकवहआववदकककजमदनतवनरसतकरसकवगद।

¶17

Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Rahul

¶18

Digitally signed by :- RAHUL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lakshman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshman v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Girishchandra Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Asad Alias Mohd. Ashad Alias Sebu vs State of U.P.

Jilajeet Prajapati vs State of U.P.

Ankush Sharma vs State of U.P.

Rahul Bind vs State of U.P.

Sumit Yadav vs State of U.P.