Bail application for involvement in alleged Shine City Infrastructure fraud under multiple IPC sections. Court granted bail noting trial had not commenced despite four years in custody.
Applicant released on bail with personal bond and two sureties, subject to three stated conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48595
Court No. - 13
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4529 of 2025
Applicant :- Amitabh Kumar Srivastava @ Amitabh Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Desh Mitra Anand,Prateek Rawat,Utkarsh Anand Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rohit Tripathi
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
counsel for the applicant that although the applicant is languishing in jail since 17.10.2020, even charges have not been framed till date.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 19.8.2025 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted bail in a large-scale financial fraud case given prolonged custody of over four years without trial commencement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amitabh Kumar Srivastava @ Amitabh Srivastava
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
