Bijendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application deferred on counsel's request for a later week so the applicant could explain a prior murder case noted in his criminal history.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43823 of 2025
Bijendra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parvish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
On the request of learned counsel for the applicant, put up in the week commencing 12.1.2026 as fresh before appropriate Bench, enabling him to explain the criminal history of one case of the applicant as pointed out by learned A.G.A., being case crime No. 314 of 2017, u/s 302 IPC, P.S. Ramala, District Baghpat.
(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)
December 18, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bijendra
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43823/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court