Devendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed before the Allahabad High Court; the State's counsel had not received instructions and sought time. The court adjourned the matter to be listed fresh on a later date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43098 of 2025
Devendra
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Yadav, Ramesh Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 70
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant is present.
Sri Shyam Narayan Rai, learned A.G.A. informs that he has not received instructions.
On the request of learned A.G.A., put up on 19.12.2025 as fresh to enable him to obtain instructions in the matter.
(Santosh Rai,J.)
December 5, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Devendra
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Santosh Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43098/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court