Ganesh Awasthi Alias Kallu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court listed the bail application for hearing on a future date as the State had not received instructions. Ordered the appearance of the ACP and Investigating Officer with the case diary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41445 of 2025
Ganesh Awasthi Alias Kallu
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Pandey, Yadavendra Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 64
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
- The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 304 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 3(5), 105 BNS, Police Station Rasoolabad, District Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of trial.
- Sri Anupam Anand, learned brief holder for the State submits that despite information having been sent to the Commissioner of Police, Kanpur Dehat, he has not received instructions.
- Place this case as fresh on 09.12.2025.
- Let the A.C.P. concerned along with the Investigating Officer appear in person on the next date along with the case diary.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ganesh Awasthi Alias Kallu
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/41445/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Krishan Pahal
- Order 2 · Krishan Pahal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court