Anil Gangwar Alias Neta vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41158 of 2025

Anil Gangwar Alias Neta

.....Applicant(s)

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Shakti Dubey, Vinay Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 65

¶6

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the FIR. The name of applicant came into light in the confessional statement of one co-accused, Sudhir. One co-accused, namely, Kuldeep Gangwar, who was also not named in the FIR and his name was also came into light in the confessional statement of the aforesaid co-accused, Sudhir, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 34313 of 2025 and as the case of applicant is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid co-accused-Kuldeep Gangwar, therefore, applicant may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 19.06.2025, with no criminal history.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant but he could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶11

BAIL No. 41158 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

Let the applicant-Anil Gangwar Alias Neta, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 272 of 2025, under Sections 70(1), 123, 351(2), 61(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Katra, District- Shahjahanpur, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶14

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶15

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.

¶16

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.

¶17

iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.

¶18

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law.

¶20

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

¶21

November 21, 2025

¶22

Mustaqeem.

¶23

Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anil Gangwar Alias Neta v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Gangwar Alias Neta v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prashant Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P.

Nitesh Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Bablu Rajbhar vs State of U.P.

Siraj Ahmad vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Israil vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kanchan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others