Allowed

Jagroop v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Nov 2025BAIL/41091/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under BNS sections for causing knife and danda injuries. Court noted injuries were simple on non-vital parts, charge sheet filed, no criminal history, and enlarged the applicant on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions; release via downloaded verified copy of order.

Jagroop vs State of U.P. — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41091 of 2025

¶3

Jagroop

¶4

	Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ravi Sahu, Sanjay	Kumar Rai
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 69

¶6

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶7

Heard Sri Ravi Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 99 of 2025, under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 109(1), 351(2) B.N.S., P.S. Sadh, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of the trial.

¶9

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that in the F.I.R. the role of causing knife injury has been assigned to the applicant, however, the injured in his statement has made allegation against the applicant for causing him head injury by danda . The injury report shows that there is no grievous injury on the head of the injured and all the injuries are on non vital parts. It is further submitted that applicant has no criminal history. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the investigation/trial proceedings.

¶10

It is also submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation and he is languishing in jail since 23.5.2025.

¶11

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶12

BAIL No. 41091 of 2025

¶13

¶14

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let the applicant- Jagroop , involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶16

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶18

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶19

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶20

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶21

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶22

The applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶23

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶24

BAIL No. 41091 of 2025

¶25

¶26

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023; гeported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

November 21, 2025 Vandana

¶29

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jagroop v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagroop v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Capt. Gurpreet Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Civil Aviation Lko. 4 Others

Shivam Soni vs State of U.P.

Shadab vs State of U.P.

Pramod Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Rekha vs State of U.P.

Azam Khan vs State of U.P.