Dismissed¶12

Toyaj Pal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2025BAIL/40515/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Samit Gopal, J.; November 18, 2025; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 40515 of 2025; Toyaj Pal v. State of U.P.; bail under Section 483 BNSS dismissed as withdrawn; non-disclosure of criminal history; para 22 of affidavit false and incorrect; Case Crime No. 102 of 2024; Sections 498-A, 304-B, 504, 506 IPC; Section 3/4 D.P. Act; P.S. Bhadohi, District Bhadohi; Munnesh v. State of U.P. SLP (Crl.) No. 1400/2025; Kaushal Singh v. State of Rajasthan 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473; liberty to file better application with full and complete documents.

What did the court decide?

Prayer allowed; bail application dismissed as withdrawn, the applicant intending to file a better application with full and complete documents. ¶12

Toyaj Pal vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40515 of 2025

¶2

Toyaj Pal

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Janardan Yadav, Kumar Pal	Mrigendra Singh, Vivek
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 66

¶5

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶6

List revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶8

This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant Toyaj Pal , seeking release on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 102 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, registered at P.S. Bhadohi, District Bhadohi.

¶9

Learned counsel for State points that as per his instructions, the applicant is reported to be involved in one other case which has not been disclosed and explained and as such para 22 of the affidavit is false and incorrect in which it is stated that the applicant has no criminal history. He submits that the bail application be dismissed in view of the order/judgement of the Apex Court passed in the cases of Munnesh Vs. State of U.P.: SLP (Crl.) No. 1400 / 2025 and Kaushal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1473.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant prays that since the criminal history of the applicant has not been disclosed and explained of the other cases, the present bail application under Section 483 BNSS be dismissed as withdrawn as he intends to file a better application with full and complete documents.

¶11

Prayer is allowed.

¶12

The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶13

(Samit Gopal,J.)

¶14

November 18, 2025 M. ARIF

¶15

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Toyaj Pal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Toyaj Pal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil vs State of U.P.

Badri vs State of U.P.

Akash vs State of U.P.

Devendra Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijendra Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ritik Rawat and Another vs State of U.P.