Sunil v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
List revised. Matter listed for fresh consideration on 09.12.2025 as counsel for the State had not received instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40247 of 2025
Sunil
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 66
HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
- List revised.
- Sri Sanjai Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State are present.
- Learned counsel for the State states that he has not received instructions in the matter.
- Let the matter be listed on 09.12.2025 as fresh.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sunil
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/40247/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court