Pravendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Fresh bail application listed for the first time; applicant's counsel sought a month's adjournment, which the court allowed and directed listing on 19.01.2026.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40343 of 2025
Pravendra Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prathamesh Upadhyay, Raju Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 66
HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
- List revised.
- Sri Harsh Narayan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Raju Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for State are present.
- Learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment in the matter for a month.
- The records show that there is one other learned counsel appearing in the matter but he is not present.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pravendra Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/40343/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sameer Jain
- Order 2 · Sameer Jain
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court