Jagdev Yadav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 39094 of 2024; Jagdev Yadav v. State of U.P.; Krishan Pahal, J.; 14.11.2025; interim order; counsel for applicant absent; fresh trial-status report demanded from Trial Judge in tabulated form (date of charge framing; prosecution witnesses proposed per charge sheet; witnesses examined with dates; presence/adjournment reasons; date of disposal and result if trial concluded); matter listed 05.12.2025 daily cause list; order to be communicated via District Judge by Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX; bail neither granted nor refused.
What did the court decide?
On revision of the list, with learned counsel for the applicant absent, the Court took no substantive decision on bail and instead required the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial of the present case.