Bail application under Sections 103(1), 3(5) BNS and 4/25 Arms Act. Court allowed bail on parity with co-accused Mohd. Aamir, already released on bail, noting no criminal history and custody since January 2025.
Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties, subject to standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38003 of 2025
Suhail Alias Aau
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 67
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
BAIL No. 38003 of 2025
2
U.P., 1993 Crl.L.J. 938 and the judgements passed by the Supreme Court in Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, MANU/SCOR/22410/2021 and in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , (2022) 10 SCC 51 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
November 17, 2025
(Ravi Kant)
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, whose role is identical to a co-accused already enlarged on bail, is entitled to bail on the ground of parity?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶6
Nanha S/o Nabhan Kha vs. State of U.P., 1993 Crl.L.J. 938
Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of InvestigationRelied on¶6
Paras Ram Vishnoi vs. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, MANU/SCOR/22410/2021
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherRelied on¶6
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suhail Alias Aau
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
