Allowed

Nadeem Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2025BAIL/37567/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under sections 109(1) and 352 BNS with simple injuries and charge sheet already filed; court enlarged the applicant on bail on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions against tampering, non-cooperation, and further criminal activity.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond and two sureties, with conditions; release via downloaded verified copy permitted and jail order through BOMS.

Nadeem Ahmad vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37567 of 2025

Nadeem Ahmad

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Vinod Kumar Tirpathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 69

¶8

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶9

Heard Sri Manoj Kr. Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶10

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 221 of 2025, under section 109(1), 352 of B.N.S., P.S. - Kanth, District Moradabad, during the pendency of the trial.

¶11

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that all the injuries are simple in nature. It is also submitted that applicant has criminal history of one petty offence in which also he was falsely implicated. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the investigation/trial proceedings.

¶12

It is also submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation and he is languishing in jail since 10.9.2025.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶14

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let the applicant- Nadeem Ahmad , involved in the aforementioned crime

¶16

BAIL No. 37567 of 2025

¶17

¶18

be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶19

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶21

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶22

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶23

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶24

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶25

The applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶26

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶27

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023; гeported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶28

November 6, 2025 Vandana

¶29

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶30

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nadeem Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nadeem Ahmad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Tiwari vs State of Up and Another

Amit Rai vs State of Up and Another

Gaurav Alias Jitin vs State of U.P.

Bobby vs State of U.P.

Dushyant vs State of U.P.

Indal vs State of U.P.