Sajid v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This High Court criminal application grants bail to the applicant under Section 483 of BNSS in a case under the UP Gangsters Act. The court holds it is a fit case for bail without opining on merits.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail subject to personal bond, two sureties, and undertaking not to tamper with witnesses or evidence.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37427 of 2025
Sajid
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Narendra Kumar, Sitendra Singh : G.A. |
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Heard Shri Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicant- Sajid, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 169 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of The Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Kutubsher, District Saharanpur, during pendency of the trial.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. One case of criminal history have sufficiently been explained.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sajid
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/37427/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court