Allowed

Muzammil Alias Sagar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC4 Nov 2025BAIL/35461/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed a bail application under Section 483 B.N.S. 2023 moved by Muzammil Alias Sagar. The court found that a bail case is made out considering the nature of accusations, evidence, and co-accused records, without commenting on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Accused-applicant released on bail on executing personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions.

Muzammil Alias Sagar vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35461 of 2025

Muzammil Alias Sagar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Avinash Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 68

¶9

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶10

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶11

Heard Shri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶12

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Muzammil @ Sagar, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 517 of 2025, under Sections-109 (1), 190, 191 (2), 191 (3(, 352, 351 (2), 115 (2) B.N.S. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station-Kairana, District-Shamli.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 22.09.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Ikhlaq and Musariq, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 35680 of 2025 and 34815 of 2025, vide orders dated 15.10.2025 and 10.10.2025. Criminal antecedent of one case has already been explained in the supplementary affidavit and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶14

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but submits that similarly circumstanced aforesaid co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court.

¶15

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a

¶16

BAIL No. 35461 of 2025

¶17

¶18

case for bail is made out.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶20

Let the accused-applicant, Muzammil @ Sagar , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶22

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶23

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶24

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶25

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶26

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶27

November 4, 2025

¶28

Deepak/

¶29

Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Muzammil Alias Sagar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muzammil Alias Sagar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zakir vs State of U.P.

Shreedhar P vs State of U.P.

Kanhaiya Singh vs State of U.P.

Babloo @ Pravez vs State of U.P.

Shivprasad Rana vs State of U.P.

Arav Gupta Alias Rinku Alias Rajeev vs State of U.P.