Vineet vs State of U.P.

Heard Sri Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vinay Kr. Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohit Baisla, learned counsel for the first informant (upon appearance filed today) learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.529 of 2025, under Sections-109(1), 351(2) & 3(5) BNS, Police Station-Lohiyanagar, District-Meerut, during the pendency of the trial.

¶12

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that general allegation has been made against all the accused persons except Ketan for firing but no one has received injury. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. It is further submitted that co-accused Honey @ Hempusph Adhana has already been released on bail by this Court in Bail Application No. 36364 of 2025, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 26.09.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶13

Learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶14

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused Honey @ Hempusph Adhana.

¶15

Let the applicant- Vineet , involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶16

BAIL No. 36636 of 2025

¶17

2

¶18

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶20

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶21

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶22

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶23

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶24

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶25

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶26

October 27, 2025 Vandana

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vineet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vineet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Himanshu and Another vs State of U.P.

Talib Mohammad vs State of U.P.

Sarojni Devi and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ankit and Another vs State of U.P.

Satish Paswan vs State of U.P.

Lala Alias Krishna vs State of U.P.