Lala Alias Krishna vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32850 of 2025

Lala Alias Krishna			.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Saurabh Sharma	Tripathi,	Sohit Prakash
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 69

¶3

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶4

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶5

Heard Sri Sohit Prakash Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms Mayuri Mehrotra, Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Criminal Case No.10325 of 2025, Case Crime No.13 of 2025, under Sections- 87, 137 BNS, Police Station-Kagaraul, District-Agra, during the pendency of the trial.

¶7

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though in the FIR allegation of enticing away the daughter of first informant has been made but as per the statement of victim recorded u/s 183 of BNSS, she is more than 17 years old and she herself left her house and even persuaded the present applicant to accompany her. Therefore, the applicant has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history of two cases. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 22.02.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not

¶8

BAIL No. 32850 of 2025

¶9

2

¶10

misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶11

Learned brief holder has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶12

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶13

Let the applicant- Lala @ Krishna, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶14

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶16

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶17

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶20

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court

¶21

BAIL No. 32850 of 2025

¶22

3

¶23

Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶24

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶25

The Registrar (Compliance) of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned jail through e- mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 .

¶26

October 27, 2025 S.C.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶28

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lala Alias Krishna v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lala Alias Krishna v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Haneef vs State of U.P.

Krishna Alias Kishna vs State of U.P.

Sarfaraz Alam vs State of U.P.

Raja Alias Raju vs State of U.P.

Ram Alias Rahul Mahaur vs State of U.P.

Abdul Ali vs State of U.P.