Allowed¶16

Karan Veer v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Nov 2025BAIL/36579/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad HC bail granted parity; Karan Veer v. State of U.P.; Bail Application No. 36579 of 2025; Case Crime No. 391 of 2025; Ss. 178, 179, 180, 3(5) BNS; PS Sadar Bazar Saharanpur; co-accused Rubal alias Prabhkeerat Singh BA 35174/2025 and Naveen Paswan BA 36392/2025 already bailed; no recovery; no criminal history; custody since 23.08.2025; personal bond two sureties; conditions and cancellation clause; downloaded-copy release; certified copy 15 days; BOMS transmission; e-mail/e-prison delivery per Apex Court 'Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re:' (2024) 10 SCC 685; Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal J.; November 10, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Karan Veer granted bail in Case Crime No. 391 of 2025 on ground of parity, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to the stated conditions.

Karan Veer vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Applicant Karan Veer granted bail in Case Crime No. 391 of 2025 on ground of parity, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to the stated conditions.

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Karan Veer, named in Case Crime No. 391 of 2025 (Sections 178, 179, 180, 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur), is entitled to be released on bail, particularly on the ground of parity with co-accused who have already been granted bail.

¶10

Court's answer

Considering the entire facts and circumstances, submissions of counsel, nature of offence, evidence and complicity of the accused, and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

The applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶16

Key takeaways

Release is subject to conditions (no inducement, threat, promise or tampering with evidence; sincere cooperation in trial/investigation without adjournment; no criminal activity after release; attendance per bond conditions), and breach of any condition shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.ratio¶21
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties shall be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.ratio¶22
The applicant may be released on the basis of a downloaded copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad, verified by the concerned counsel with an undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted on parity — Allahabad High Court (Deshwal, J.), 10.11.2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 36579 of 2025, Karan Veer v. State of U.P.: Applicant sought bail in Case Crime No. 391 of 2025 under Sections 178, 179, 180, 3(5) B.N.S., PS Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur. Counsel contended nothing was recovered from the applicant, he was merely present with co-accused per FIR allegations, had no criminal history, and was in custody since 23.08.2025; co-accused Rubal alias Prabhkeerat Singh and Naveen Paswan had already been bailed by this Court in Bail Application Nos. 35174 and 36392 of 2025. The A.G.A. opposed but could not dispute these facts. Holding the applicant entitled to bail on the ground of parity, and expressly without expressing opinion on merits, the Court ordered release on a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, imposing standard conduct conditions whose breach would constitute ground for cancellation, with identity/status/residence verification before bond acceptance. Operative directions: release permissible on a downloaded copy of the order verified by counsel (certified copy within 15 days); trial court to transmit the release order via BOMS; office to send a copy to the inmate through the Jail Superintendent by e-mail/e-prison portal in compliance with the Apex Court order in 'Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021', (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36579 of 2025

Karan Veer

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 69

¶8

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶9

Heard Shri Arvind Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Anurag Pandey, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶10

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 391 of 2025 under Sections 178, 179, 180, 3(5) B.N.S. Police Station-Sadar Bazar, District-Saharanpur.

¶11

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is also submitted that as per the allegations levelled in the F.I.R. the applicant is said to be present along with co-accused persons. It is further submitted that co-accused Rubal Alias Prabhkeerat Singh and Naveen Paswan have already been released on bail by this Court in Bail Application Nos. 35174 of 2025 & 36392 of 2025 respectively. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused persons. It is further submitted that applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 23.08.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the investigation/trial proceedings.

¶12

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶13

BAIL No. 36579 of 2025

¶14

¶15

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused.

¶16

Let the applicant- Karan Veer, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶17

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶18

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶19

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶20

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶21

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶22

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶23

The applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶24

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 11.

¶25

BAIL No. 36579 of 2025

¶26

¶27

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023; reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 .

¶28

November 10, 2025 SY

¶29

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶30

Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Karan Veer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Veer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mustaq Ali vs State of U.P.

Nadeem Ahmad vs State of U.P.

Virendra Singh vs State of U.P.

Anas vs State of U.P.

Babulal Kushwaha vs State of U.P.

Krishna Alias Kishna vs State of U.P.