Surendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a bail application where the applicant was not present. The court dismissed the application due to absence and directed the trial judge to submit a delay report with specific trial details.
What the court decided
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3655 of 2025
Applicant :- Surendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Swayamanand Sisodiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised. None is present to press this application.
- Learned Trial Judge concerned shall forthwith send a report regarding the status of the trial and cause for the delay in concluding the trial of the present case with the following details in tabulated form:-
(i) Date on which the charge-sheet was filed.
(ii) Date on which the charge was framed.
(iii) Number of witnesses mentioned in calendar.
(iv) Number and particulars (i.e. name, nature of witness like eye witness and expert witness etc.) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Surendra
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3655/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Krishan Pahal
- Order 2 · Krishan Pahal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court