Amichand v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Oct 2025BAIL/34948/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted, Allahabad High Court, single bench (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.), order dated 03.11.2025; applicant Amichand; Case Crime No. 114 of 2025; offences under BNS Sections 191(2), 115(2), 110, 109(1); Police Station Tappal, District Aligarh; charge sheet filed; custody since 07.06.2025; personal bond plus two sureties; bail conditions incl. no tampering and no criminal activity; BOMS and e-prison portal release directions; Apex Court suo motu order (2024) 10 SCC 685 followed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to applicant Amichand: release on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the stated conditions; identity, status and residence proof of applicant and sureties to be verified before bonds are accepted. ¶¶14

Amichand vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶14

Issue for consideration

Whether applicant Amichand is entitled to be released on bail in Case Crime No. 114 of 2025 (Sections 191(2), 115(2), 110, 109(1) BNS, Police Station-Tappal, District-Aligarh) during the pendency of the trial.

¶¶10

Court's answer

Considering the entire facts and circumstances, submissions of counsel, nature of offence, evidence and complicity of accused, and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶¶14

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to stated conditions (no inducement/threat/tampering, cooperation in trial/investigation, no criminal activity, attendance per bond); breach of any condition shall be ground for cancellation of bail.

¶¶18

Key takeaways

Ancillary directions: identity, status and residence proof of applicant and sureties to be verified before bonds are accepted; release permitted on downloaded, counsel-verified copy of the order with undertaking to file certified copy within 15 days; trial court to transmit release order via Bail Order Management System (BOMS); Registrar (Compliance) to send copy to jail via e-mail/e-prison portal in compliance of the Apex Court order in Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 ((2024) 10 SCC 685).obiter¶¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 69), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 34948 of 2025, decided November 3, 2025 by Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.: regular bail granted to Amichand in Case Crime No. 114 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 110, 109(1) BNS, Police Station-Tappal, District-Aligarh, pending trial. Charge sheet already filed; applicant in custody since 7.6.2025; A.G.A. opposed but did not dispute those facts. Court, without expressing any opinion on merits and considering nature of offence, evidence and complicity, held applicant entitled to bail on a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions (no tampering/inducement, sincere cooperation without adjournments, no further criminal activity, attendance per bond), breach being ground for cancellation. Release allowed on downloaded, counsel-verified copy with certified copy to follow within 15 days; trial court directed to route release order via Bail Order Management System (BOMS), and Registrar (Compliance) to notify jail by e-mail/e-prison portal in compliance of the Apex Court order in Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021, гeported (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34948 of 2025

Amichand

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ravi Pandey, Suraj Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Court No. - 69

¶8

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶10

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.114 of 2025, under Sections-191(2), 115(2), 110, 109(1) of BNS, Police Station-Tappal, District-Aligarh, during the pendency of the trial.

¶11

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that there is no incriminating material against the applicant in the case diary except general and vague allegation. It is further submitted that applicant has no criminal history. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the investigation/trial proceedings.

¶12

It is also submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation and he is languishing in jail since 7.6.2025.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶14

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Let the applicant- Amichand , involved in the aforementioned crime be

¶16

BAIL No. 34948 of 2025

¶17

¶18

released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶19

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶21

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶22

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶23

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶24

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶25

The applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶26

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶27

The Registrar (Compliance) of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned jail through e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023; гeported in (2024) 10 SCC 685.

¶28

November 3, 2025 Vandana

¶29

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶30

Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amichand v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amichand v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Balveer Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lko. and 3 Others

Ajay vs State of U.P.

Azhar Alias Zahruddin vs State of U.P.

Pawan Kumar Patel vs State of U.P.

Shiva vs State of U.P.

Taha Ahmad vs State of U.P.