Vijay Shanker vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32995 of 2025

Vijay Shanker

		.....Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ashok Kumar Kumar Dubey	Yadav, Saroj
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 69

¶4

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.166 of 2025, under Sections-109(1), 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of BNS, Police Station-Khukhundu, District-Deoria, during the pendency of the trial.

¶8

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is absolutely innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accused Ramnivas, has already been released on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31014 of 2025 vide order dated 17.09.2025. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 18.07.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail

¶9

BAIL No. 32995 of 2025

¶10

2

¶11

and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶12

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶13

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Let the applicant- Vijay Shanker, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶15

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶17

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶18

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the

¶22

BAIL No. 32995 of 2025

¶23

3

¶24

undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶25

It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶26

The Registrar (Compliance) of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned jail through e- mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 .

¶27

November 3, 2025 S.C.

¶28

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶29

Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Shanker v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Shanker v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Haneef vs State of U.P.

Krishna Alias Kishna vs State of U.P.

Sarfaraz Alam vs State of U.P.

Raja Alias Raju vs State of U.P.

Ram Alias Rahul Mahaur vs State of U.P.

Abdul Ali vs State of U.P.