Amit Kumar @ Kallu Vs State of U.P.

Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 091 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Dakor, District Jalaun, during the pendency of trial.

¶11

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang.

¶12

There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.07.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶13

Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and also the fact that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶14

BAIL No. 30825 of 2025

¶15

2

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. The bail application is allowed .

¶17

Let the applicant- Amit Kumar @ Kallu , who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶18

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial.

¶19

ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses.

¶20

iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.

¶21

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶22

It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.

¶23

(Krishan Pahal,J.)

¶24

September 17, 2025

¶25

Sumit S

¶26

Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amit Kumar @ Kallu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar @ Kallu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases