Allowed

Pappu Ansari v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2025BAIL/3081/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Pappu Ansari in a criminal case involving Sections 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5) of the B.N.S. facing allegations of involvement in mobile phone recovery. The court considered false implication, lack of independent witnesses, and trial delays, setting bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties, conditioned not to tamper with evidence or commit further crimes.

Pappu Ansari vs State of U.P. — Narcotics (NDPS) | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37020

¶2

Court No. - 67

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3081 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Pappu Ansari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Pappu Ansari with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.277 of 2024, under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) B.N.S., P.S. G.R.P.Gorakhpur, District Gorakhpur during pendency of the trial.

¶8

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicant has been implicated in the present case after recovery of 22 mobile phones. Allegation alleged in the FIR is false and baseless and not supported by any independent witness. Applicant has three cases of criminal history, which has been explained in the affidavit of bail application. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.10.2024 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant, Pappu Ansari, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 17.3.2025 SKD

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pappu Ansari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Ansari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar vs State of U.P.

Chandrasen Vishwakarma vs State of U.P.

Mishkin and 4 Others vs State of U.P.

Vishal Yadav vs State of U.P.

Ahsan Khan vs State of U.P.

Shahrukh Khan vs State of U.P.