Abhay Yadav vs State of U.P.

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Abhay Yadav , seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 63 of 2025, under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 103 (1), 109, 3 (5), 352 BNS, Police Station- Vrindavan, District- Mathura.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 30.01.2025. It is submitted that similarly placed co-accused, Vishal Gautam and Nandu Thakur @ Nand Kishor have already been enlarged on bail of by the Bench of this Court by orders dated 18.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 24999 of 2025 and 23413 of 2025, copy of the bail orders produced by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Vishal Gautam and Nandu Thakur @ Nand Kishor, who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. He has criminal antecedent of one case,

¶12

BAIL No. 30514 of 2025

¶13

2

¶14

which has been explained in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the bail application and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶15

Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶16

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶18

Let the accused-applicant, Abhay Yadav involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶19

i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶20

ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶21

iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶22

iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶23

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶24

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶25

September 18, 2025 v.k.updh.

¶26

Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Abhay Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhay Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Akshayjeet Alias Moni vs State of U.P.

Rampal vs State of U.P.

Monti vs State of U.P.

Amar Gaud vs State of U.P.

Rohit Singh Urf Tota vs State of U.P.

Rajesh vs State of U.P.