Piyush Yadav Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29734 of 2025

Piyush Yadav

	Versus		.....Ap	plicant(s)
State of U.P.			.....	Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Lutfi Hasni Siddiqui	Niyazi,	Uns	Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 66

¶6

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶7

Heard Shri Uns Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Varun Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record.

¶8

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Piyush Yadav, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 70 of 2024, under sections 318 (4), 319 (2), 336 93), 338, 340 (2), 111 of B.N.S. Sections 66-C and 66-D of the Infomration Technology Act and Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, Police station-Cyber Crime, Police StationAzamgarh, District-Azamgarh.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 22.03.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Dhanjeet Yadav, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 25839 of 2025 vide order dated 05.08.2025. Applicant has no criminal antecedents and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.

¶10

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but submits that similarly circumstanced aforesaid co-accused has already

¶11

BAIL No. 29734 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

been granted bail by this Court.

¶14

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶15

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶16

Let the accused-applicant, Piyush Yadav , involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶17

The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶18

The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶19

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.

¶20

The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶21

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶22

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶23

September 15, 2025 Deepak/

¶24

Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Piyush Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Piyush Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases