Satyam Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for hearing; no counsel appeared for the applicant. The court directed the matter to be relisted as fresh on 20.08.2025.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25144 of 2025
Applicant :- Satyam Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
On the matter being taken up in the revised list, none appears on behalf of the applicant to address the Court, whereas learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State is present.
However, in the interest of justice, let the matter be listed on 20.08.2025 as fresh.
Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Ishrat
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ISHRAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satyam Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/25144/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Santosh Rai
- Order 2 · Santosh Rai
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court