Suraj Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35908

Court No. - 11

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2266 of 2025

Applicant :- Suraj Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Durgesh Kumar Shukla,Basant Pandey,Kanchan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 28 of 2025 under Sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Purakalandar, District- Ayodhya, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

¶8

Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an innocent person, who has falsely been implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 20.1.2025. It is further submitted on behalf of applicant that it is undisputed that three cases have been shown in the gang chart and in the said cases, the applicant is on bail. It is next submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not involve in any activity, which is against the law. It is, thus, submitted that the applicant is entitled for bail. It is also submitted that in case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for grant of bail, but fairly concedes that in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, applicant is on bail.

¶10

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for parties and going through the record as also in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant that the applicant will not involve in any activity, which is against the law, the twin conditions contained under Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act stand satisfied.

¶11

In view of above, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶12

Let applicant, namely, Suraj Kumar Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime No. 28 of 2025 under Sections 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Purakalandar, District- Ayodhya, on

¶13

his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶17

(iv) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229A I.P.C./269 B.N.S.

¶18

(v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C./84 B.N.S.S. may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C./209 B.N.S.

¶19

(vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (a) opening of the case, (b) framing of charge; and (c) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the trial court, absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶20

Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and the court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail.

¶21

With above directions, the bail application is allowed .

¶22

Order Date :- 19.6.2025 AKK

¶23

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Suraj Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Divyanshu Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko

Babu Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Dharm Pal Singh Alias Dharmpal Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. and Another

Shivam Verma Vs State of U.P Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Lucknow

Ashok Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.

Shobhit Kashyap @ Anurag Kashyap Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.