Mateen v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court interim bail-application order (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 22584 of 2025; Mateen v. State of U.P.; Krishan Pahal, J.; 20.11.2025): Trial Judge asked to report trial status in tabular form — date of charge framing, prosecution witnesses proposed per charge sheet and already examined with dates, adjournment counts and reasons, or disposal date and result if trial finished; re-listing fixed for 11.12.2025; order copy routed via District Judge through Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.
What did the court decide?
The Court directed the learned Trial Judge concerned to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering (i) the date on which the charge was framed, (ii) the number and particulars (name, nature e.g. eye-witness/expert) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) the names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates, and (iv) the number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned with reasons; the details need not be sent if the trial has been decided, but the date of disposal and the result must be mentioned.