Dismissed¶¶10

Raju Neta Alias Shadab v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Jul 2025BAIL/20991/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court 2025 bail rejection; Raju Neta Alias Shadab; criminal history 13 cases vs 8 cases declared in affidavit paragraph 23; incorrect affidavit declaration; reliance on Munnesh v. State of U.P., 2025 SCC Online SC 1319 (Supreme Court); no ground to consider bail at this stage; liberty for fresh bail application disclosing criminal history and trial status in first five paragraphs; approach after reasonable period; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION 20991 of 2025; order date 18.8.2025.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; however, liberty granted to file a fresh bail application disclosing details of all criminal history in the first five paragraphs of the subsequent bail application including status of trial in each case, and the applicant is to approach the Court only after a reasonable period. ¶¶10

Raju Neta Alias Shadab vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether bail should be granted to Raju Neta Alias Shadab despite his admitted criminal history of 13 cases and an incorrect declaration in the bail affidavit claiming only 8 cases.

¶¶9

Court's answer

In view of the admitted criminal history of 13 cases and the incorrect affidavit declaration, and in light of Munnesh v. State of U.P., 2025 SCC Online SC 1319, this Court finds no ground to consider the applicant's bail at this stage.

¶¶9

Ratio / Principle

The declaration made in paragraph 23 of the affidavit of the present bail application is incorrect because the applicant admittedly has a criminal history of 13 cases (whereas the affidavit claimed 8 cases besides the present case).

¶¶7

Key takeaways

Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh bail application disclosing details of all criminal history in the first five paragraphs of the subsequent bail application, including the status of trial in each case.obiter¶¶11
The applicant is directed to approach this Court only after a reasonable period.obiter¶¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail rejected — false declaration of criminal history. Applicant Raju Neta Alias Shadab (CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20991 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.; order dated 18.8.2025) declared a criminal history of 8 cases in paragraph 23 of his bail affidavit, whereas he admittedly has a criminal history of 13 cases. Relying on Munnesh v. State of U.P., 2025 SCC Online SC 1319 (Supreme Court), the Court found no ground to consider bail at this stage and rejected the application. Liberty was reserved to file a fresh bail application disclosing all criminal history, including trial status in each case, in the first five paragraphs, to be approached only after a reasonable period.

Raju Neta Alias Shadab v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Neta Alias Shadab v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rajeev Kumar vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Kapildev Yadav vs Food Corporation of India and 5 Others

Prema Devi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajeshwar Singh vs State of U.P.

Shiv Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Sudhanshu Shekhar Mishra vs Canara Bank (Nationalised Bank) and 5 Others