Disposed¶18

Indrajeet v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Aug 2025BAIL/20514/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim/administrative order, Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20514 of 2025, Indrajeet applicant v. State of U.P. opposite party; counsel Narendra Kumar and Pawan Kumar Yadav for applicant, G.A. for State; Justice Krishan Pahal; trial status report sought from trial judge (charge-framing date, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, adjournments with reasons, disposal date and result if concluded); matter listed 6.11.2025; order to be communicated via District Judge/Registrar (Compliance); no statute or precedent cited; no bail granted or refused.

What did the court decide?

None; the Court issued directions for a fresh trial-status report and listed the application with the report for 6.11.2025. ¶18

Indrajeet vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the Court issued directions for a fresh trial-status report and listed the application with the report for 6.11.2025.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The Court directed the learned Trial Judge concerned to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, covering: (i) date of framing of charge; (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined per the charge sheet; (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates; (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons; and (v) if the trial stands decided, the date of disposal and result instead of the said details.

¶12

Key takeaways

The bail application, along with the trial-status report, was listed for 6.11.2025 in the daily cause list; no bail decision was made at this stage.ratio¶18
A copy of the order was to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 67), single-judge order dated 14 October 2025 (Krishan Pahal, J.) in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20514 of 2025 (Indrajeet v. State of U.P.). No bail decision was rendered. The Court directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial in tabulated form, detailing: (i) the date on which charge was framed; (ii) number and particulars (name, nature such as eye witness/expert witness) of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet; (iii) names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates; (iv) number of times the witness was present and the case adjourned, with reasons; and (v) if the trial is decided, merely the date of disposal and result. The application was placed, along with the report, on 6.11.2025 in the daily cause list, and a copy of the order was to be conveyed to the trial judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

Indrajeet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indrajeet v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vinod Patel Alias Tillu vs State of U.P.

Neetu Yadav vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jiya Khan @ Gudiya vs State of U.P.

Ashish vs State of U.P.

Guddi Devi vs State of U.P.

Mukesh Pasi vs State of U.P.