Disposed¶13

Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Jun 2025BAIL/20114/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court order, Justice Krishan Pahal, 29.7.2025, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20114 of 2025, Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.: bail decision deferred; Trial Judge required to submit fresh tabulated report on trial status and causes of delay (charge-sheet filing, charge framing, witnesses in calendar, prosecution witnesses proposed versus examined, adjournments with reasons); matter listed with report for 20.08.2025; order to be communicated via District Judge by Registrar (Compliance).

What did the court decide?

No bail decision rendered; directions issued to the Trial Judge to furnish a fresh tabulated report on trial status and causes of delay, and the application listed along with the report for 20.08.2025, with the order to be communicated through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance). ¶13

Vikas Bind vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Status of the ongoing trial of the present case and the cause for delay in concluding it, sought by way of a fresh report from the Trial Judge before further consideration of the bail application.

¶6

Court's answer

The Court directed the learned Trial Judge concerned to forthwith send a fresh report, in tabulated form, on the status of the trial and the cause for delay, covering: (i) date of filing of the charge-sheet; (ii) date of framing of the charge; (iii) number of witnesses mentioned in the calendar; (iv) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined per the charge sheet; (v) names/number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates; and (vi) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons.

¶6

Ratio / Principle

Further consideration of the bail application was deferred; the application is to be placed along with the Trial Judge's report on 20.08.2025 in the daily cause list.

¶13

Key takeaways

Administrative direction: a copy of the order is to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge concerned by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.obiter¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Justice Krishan Pahal), order dated 29.7.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 20114 of 2025 (Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.): without deciding the bail application, the Court directed the learned Trial Judge concerned to forthwith send a fresh report in tabulated form on (i) the date of filing of the charge-sheet, (ii) the date of framing of the charge, (iii) the number of witnesses mentioned in the calendar, (iv) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (v) the names and number of prosecution witnesses already examined with dates, and (vi) the occasions on which witnesses were present and the case adjourned, with reasons for adjournment — so as to establish the status of the trial and the cause for the delay in concluding it. The application, along with the report, was listed for 20.08.2025 in the daily cause list, and a copy of the order was directed to be sent to the trial judge through the District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.

Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pradeep Kumar vs State of U.P.

Panna Lal Yadav vs State of U.P.

Khesharilal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Faeem vs State of U.P.

Prashant Tiwari vs State of U.P.

Suraj vs State of U.P. and 3 Others