Bail application under Sections 103(1), 238(A) BNS in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence, chiefly last-seen testimony by an inimical witness, with no specific motive and no criminal history. The court found the last-seen evidence unconvincing and allowed bail subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21541
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1901 of 2025
Applicant :- Alok Patel Alias Nane Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Tripathi,Surya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
counsel for the applicant.
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and antisocial activity.
of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial.
Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail in a circumstantial-evidence case resting mainly on last-seen evidence with no proved motive.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Alok Patel Alias Nane
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
