Rohit Haddi Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:122093

Court No. - 70

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16456 of 2025

Applicant :- Rohit Haddi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is named in the F.I.R. along with one co-accused-Monu Rathore. As per the statement of injured the allegation of causing injuries to him has been assigned to the co-accused, Monu Rathore and the role of catching hold and exhortation has been assigned to the applicant. Thus, it is argued that the main role has been assigned to the applicant and he is in jail since 03.10.2024, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It is next contended that there is a criminal history of 25 cases against the applicant and in three cases he is acquitted while in other cases he is on bail.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence.

¶9

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant- Rohit Haddi , be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 89 of 2024, under Sections 308(2), 109, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Harvans Mohal, District- Kanpur Nagar, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶12

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.

¶13

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.

¶14

iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission.

¶15

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law.

¶17

Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Mustaqeem.

¶18

Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rohit Haddi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Haddi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases