Allowed

Rukmesh Alias Nepali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 May 2025BAIL/14726/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 351(2) and 190 for an offence at police station Hathras Gate, district Hathras. The court found parity with a co-accused already enlarged on bail, no stringent material, no possibility of tampering, and granted bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties of the like amount, subject to five stated conditions; liberty reserved to trial court to cancel bail on breach.

Rukmesh Alias Nepali Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70113

¶2

Court No. - 86

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14726 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Rukmesh Alias Nepali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Subhash Chand Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd Rukmesh Alias Nepali dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 3 lu 2025] vUrxZr /kkjk 191(2), 191(3), 109, 351(2), 190 B.N.S., Fkkuk gkFkjl xsV] ftyk gkFkjl esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] iz’uxr ?kVuk esa vkosnd dh lkekU; Hkwfedk dk dFku fd;k x;k gS] rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk esa vkosnd ,oa lg vfHk;qDr lR; izdk’k mQZ lsV~Vh ds fo:) ,d gh izdkj ds vkjksi yxk, x, gSa rFkk mDr lg vfHk;qDr dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 11143 lu 2025 esa bl U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 7&4&2025 }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] rFkk vkosnd dk dsl mlh ds leku gS] blfy, vkosnd Hkh mDr lg vfHk;qDr ls lekurk ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 18&1&2025 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;] fdUrq mUgksaus ;g Lohdkj fd;k fd vkosnd dk dsl mDr lg vfHk;qDr ds leku gSA

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa mlh /kujkf’k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶18

fn0 % 2&5&2025 ds0lh0flag

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rukmesh Alias Nepali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rukmesh Alias Nepali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases