Mohd. Faiz @ Faiz v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second bail application of Mohd. Faiz @ Faiz rejected (Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, Lucknow Bench, 1.4.2025); offences under Sections 376-D, 342, 323, 504, 506, 366 IPC, Case Crime No. 72 of 2024, P.S. Hansvar, District Ambedkar Nagar; first bail application No.7510 of 2024 rejected 30.07.2024; post-rejection statements of informant and victim suggested relationship with co-accused Aamir but victim's statement categorically implicated the applicant in rape and beating; doctor's 'no injury in urine passage' observation held irrelevant as urine passage and genitals are distinct; no good ground to take a different view from the coordinate Bench.
What did the court decide?
On perusal of the victim's statement, she categorically stated that the applicant and co-accused Aamir had raped her and both of them had beaten her also, and that she got terrified due to the incident.