The High Court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case, relying on the fact that a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. The application was allowed with standard conditions, including a personal bond and sureties.
Bail granted on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each in the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74074
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12188 of 2025
Applicant :- Sandeep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tribhuwan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
(i). The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 BNSS. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate of without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.5.2025 AKT
(Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail on parity with a co-accused already granted bail in a similar case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sandeep
State of U.P.
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
