Vikas Bind vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75063

Court No. - 47

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11704 of 2025

Applicant :- Vikas Bind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Upadhyaya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Heard Shri Anurag Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶7

There are allegations in the First Information Report that brother of the informant was looking after his field and living in hut. Food was given to him at 10 P.M. on 12.9.2024. On the next day, dead body of the deceased was found and his neck was slit.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that First Information Report has been lodged on the allegations that deceased had dispute with applicant, therefore, he has been assigned the role of causing his murder . It is a case of false implication.First Information Report was lodged after inquest proceeding, falsely implicating the applicant. It is mentioned in the First Information Report that on the place of incident mobile phone of the applicant was found but in the inquest report where recovered article is required to be mentioned, it is mentioned 'nil'. Recovery of knife has been shown from applicant and name of two recovery witnesses namely, Badri Prasad and Harish Chand are mentioned on memo of recovery but their signatures are not present on the same.The applicant is in jail since 13.9.2024 and has no criminal history to his credit.

¶9

On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677. and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant,Vikas Bind , involved in Case Crime No.263of 2024 , under Section-103(1) B.N.S., Police Station- Sarpataha, DistrictJaunpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Atul kr. sri.

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Bind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pappu Alias Mohan vs State of U.P.

Anurag vs State of U.P.

Abhay Singh Kushwaha vs State of U.P.

Raghvendra and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Akshay Baliyan vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashfak vs State of U.P.