Allowed¶18

Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh v. State of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC17 Dec 2025BAIL/11051/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh in FIR/Case Crime No. 313 of 2025 on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount, subject to the imposed additional conditions; breach entitles the trial court to cancel bail. ¶18

Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused-applicant, Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh, arraigned in FIR/Case Crime No. 313 of 2025 (Sections 103(1), 126(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Lambhua, District Sultanpur), should be enlarged on bail.

¶11

Court's answer

Considering the facts and circumstances, the record, the nature of allegations and the arguments of counsel, the Court found the case fit for grant of bail without expressing any opinion on the merits.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The applicant is to be released on bail in the aforesaid FIR/case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to five additional conditions imposed in the interest of justice (attendance before the trial court, appearance at opening of case/framing of charge/Section 313 Cr.P.C. recording, no tampering with prosecution witnesses, no illegal activities during bail, and liberty to the trial court to cancel bail on breach).

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Brij Raj Singh, J. (17.12.2025): Bail allowed to Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh in FIR/Case Crime No. 313 of 2025 (Sections 103(1), 126(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Lambhua, District Sultanpur), the Court finding it a fit case for bail without expressing any opinion on merits. Parity was pleaded with co-accused Shubham Singh, granted bail on 11.12.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10681 of 2025. Custody since 22.07.2025. Release ordered on personal bond and two reliable sureties of like amount, with conditions including presence at opening of case, framing of charge and Section 313 Cr.P.C. statement recording (default actionable under Section 229-A IPC), non-tampering with witnesses, and abstention from illegal activities; breach permits cancellation of bail by the trial court.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11051 of 2025

¶3

Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Snigdha Singh, Harsh Vardhan Kediya
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 16

¶9

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Mamta Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.313 of 2025 under sections 103(1), 126(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Lambhua, District Sultanpur.

¶12

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned counsel for applicant further submits that the co-accused namely, Shubham Singh has been granted bail by this Court on 11.12.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10681 of 2025 and case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence, applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is lastly contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 22.07.2025.

¶13

Learned A.G.A has, however, opposed the prayer for grant of bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the

¶15

BAIL No. 11051 of 2025

¶16

¶17

learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.

¶18

Let applicant- Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following additional conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶19

(1) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

(2) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶21

(3) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

¶22

(4) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the period of bail.

¶23

(5) In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.

¶24

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶25

December 17, 2025 Mohit Singh/-

¶26

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh v. State of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu Singh @ Dheeraj Singh v. State of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikas Prashant Lal vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. and Another

Prashant Pandey and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Smt. Shanti Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ram Nath Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Helix Technology Thru. Its Pro. Priyanka Mishra Vs Special Court N.I. Act Lko.

Pintulal Vs State Ofu.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.